On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Guillaume ALAUX <guillaume@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 9 September 2014 12:25, lolilolicon <lolilolicon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> To be sure, I do appreciate your effort, Guillaume. No one likes to deal >> with this java crap. I don't have strong objections against your general >> approach, only this particular packaging practice. Let's improve it. > >> To be sure, I do appreciate your effort > The vocabulary you use to describe this package prevents you from > stating that you "appreciate" my effort. I appreciate the effort you put into working out a way to deal with the mess that is java. It does not conflict with the fact that I think the current state of java-common is imperfect, and indeed is, IMO, substandard. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings, but realize that I'm merely stating that one particular package is bad, and it needs our attention. Please do not take it personally. Disregard what particular language I used -- I should add that my temperament in this particular case was in no small part due to my dislike of java. Again I apologize for the harm I did not intend.
