On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Thorsten Töpper <atsutane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As long as I don't make a problem > for another TU or a developer I stay to the current setup of the > package, when I add a ksh symlink to the package stating it also > provides the ksh I take users the chance to install the original ksh > and the mksh. There are users who don't want an extended shell because > they work with the original since a lot of years on different systems. I'm frankly embarassed I didn't think of this, and withdraw my question. Especially given it was motivated by my convenience, not any kind of technical reasoning.
