Re: Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
> > On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1,
> > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the
> > > current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2?
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, at evolution-list@xxxxxxxxx Patrick
> > > O'Callaghan wrote:
> > >> the latest stable release currently being 3.12.2
> > > 
> > > "The latest stable release tarballs were uploaded on May 12, 2014:
> > > 
> > > evolution-3.12.2.tar.xz (NEWS)
> > > evolution-data-server-3.12.2.tar.xz (NEWS)" -
> > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution#Get_the_Source_Code
> > 
> > The wiki page wasn't updated for the latest stable release:
> > 
> > https://download.gnome.org/sources/evolution/3.12/
> > 
> > The tags in the Git repositories are the best source of information, not
> > the wiki documentation.
> 
> IIUC this doesn't mean that it's the current stable version.
> "LATEST-IS-3.13.3 23-Jun-2014 07:15" -
> https://download.gnome.org/sources/evolution/3.13/
> 
> IIUC 3.13.2 is the official stable release from upstream.
      3.12.2 pardon a typo, ...12..., not ...13... .




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux