On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 22:53 +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> But perl-term-readline-gnu and subversion are marked to be rebuild.
> Both were updated today by Felix and I do not see a problem.
>
> So should we take anything find-broken-perl-packages tells us for
> granted? Can it have false positives?
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ grep subversion /var/log/pacman.log
[snip]
[2014-06-04 20:49] [PACMAN] upgraded subversion (1.8.9-1 -> 1.8.9-2)
^^^^^
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ grep subversion /tmp/find-broken-perl-package.EI1SQhNZ/pacman.txt
subversion
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ ls -hAl /tmp/find-broken-perl-package.EI1SQhNZ/pacman.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 rocketmouse rocketmouse 104 Jun 4 22:25 /tmp/find-broken-perl-package.EI1SQhNZ/pacman.txt
^^^^^
Suspect ;)!
