Re: [arch-general] .desktop and install files in general & Eclipse package not complete?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 2014-05-06 11:10, Marcel Korpel wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Doug Newgard <scimmia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2014-05-06 08:45, Marcel Korpel wrote:
update-desktop-database -q
[…]
Have you bothered finding out what that command actually does? Once you do,
you'd see that it's useless in this case.

Ah, it's only necessary to update the MIME cache, so files with a
certain extension are automatically loaded within a certain
application? Sorry, I don't use a desktop environment, so I didn't
know what the behaviour was.

$ pacman -Qo gtk-update-icon-cache
/usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache is owned by gtk-update-icon-cache 2.24.23-1

So shouldn't those packages with an icon theme depend on
gtk-update-icon-cache instead of just on hicolor-icon-theme?
eclipse depends on gtk2, which depends on gtk-update-icon-cache, which
depends on hicolor-icon-theme. The deps are already satisfied, which is why
namcap didn't complain.

So, about eclipse: it isn't necessary, but in general: the Wiki should
say that gtk-update-icon-cache should be included as a dependency (if
it isn't satisfied by something else) instead of hicolor-icon-theme,
which doesn't provide gtk-update-icon-cache. Am I right?

If you're going to run a program, it obviously needs to be a dependency.

Is the Eclipse package wrong or is the Wiki not complete (also note
that the recommended install file of gedit [4] isn't that complete: it
doesn't contain a call to gtk-update-icon-cache as it doesn't contain
a hicolor icon theme; perhaps we should look for another example)?
If it doesn't install an icon, there's obviously no need to call
gtk-update-icon-cache.

No, of course not, but the Wiki says: "The gedit package contains a
very generic install file". However, the gedit install file isn't as
generic as claimed: it isn't targeted at updating the icon cache.

That section is very out of date. Looks like the substance hasn't really changed since it was first created in 2008, even though the install file has changed. The pkgname variable referenced hasn't even existed since 2011.


Regards,
Marcel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux