Re: Is ATI more... "compatible"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is ATI more... "compatible"?
From: Dimitris Zervas <dzervas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 16:01:27 +0300
In-reply-to: <53677FF6.9040209@gmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On May 5, 2014 3:11 PM, "Nowaker" <enwukaer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dimitris,
>
> You may find this news interesting:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTY4MTc
>
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Damian Nowak
> StratusHost
> www.AtlasHost.eu

Will I need a new mobo for this?
Or it's just sofware?

References:
- Is ATI more... "compatible"?
  - From: Dimitris Zervas
- Re: Is ATI more... "compatible"?
  - From: Nowaker

Prev by Date: Re: Is ATI more... "compatible"?
Next by Date: Re: Comment on: Use systemd timers instead of /etc/cron.{hourly, daily, weekly, monthly}?
Previous by thread: Re: Is ATI more... "compatible"?
Next by thread: Re: Select page style in Firefox 29.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux