On Friday 18 Apr 2014 10:29:56 Jerome Leclanche wrote: > Hi > > With Qt5 becoming more and more available throughout Qt apps > (especially as KDE progresses into the switch), I think it's time to > consider adopting an updated naming scheme. > > IMHO: > - Qt4 apps should use the -qt4 suffix > - Qt5 apps should not use any suffix or prefix > - Qt libraries should probably use a qt- prefix. (eg what is currently > qt5-base, qt5-doc etc should become qt-base, qt-location). Or > alternatively, no prefix at all and use upstream naming scheme > (qtbase, qtlocation, ...) I'm not a big fan of this transition happening for every major Qt release. Is there a significant downside to keeping both -qt4 and -qt5 in package names? Paul
