Re: [arch-dev-public] providing grsecurity in [community]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



My reply to the arch-dev-public discussion.

I'd say an unofficial repo is the way to go for the time being.
linux-grsec in the AUR only has 44 votes, so it is not screaming out for
inclusion in the repos.

Alan, please also include 64 votes for AppArmor and 19 for SELinux. It sums up to 127. As Daniel said, everyone will be happy to drop their AppArmors and SELinuxes to whatever the official repo will provide.

Anyway, votes have rarely been a reason for moving packages from AUR into community. It seems we are now facing a situation where the number of votes is a hard requirement for the package to make its way into community. It has never been a case, and I hope it doesn't happen now. Some TU is interested in maintaining linux-grsec, it won't affect anybody else he claims, so I don't see what the big deal is.

--
Kind regards,
Damian Nowak
StratusHost
www.AtlasHost.eu


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux