-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/28/2014 04:00 PM, Arthur Țițeică wrote: > My conclusions so far: there's no difference between the stock -ARCH kernel > and my -NOLSM build in which I disabled all LSMs (and hence audit). > > Note: the final test with 500000 files for the rotational disk isn't finished > yet because... really... I shaved twice during the HDD tests. > > A side note regarding these tests: SSDs act according to their fame and HDDs > are as misleading as a daily horoscope. > > I do plan to also test a no-debug but LSM enabled kernel even if it's just for > the sake of statistics. > > ¹ https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/29107946/linux-lsm/postmark-test.ods Arthur, Thank you for taking the time to do these tests. At least this provides a bit of real-world performance data to consider. Please provide a link to the no-debug LSM enabled kernel data when you have shaved twice-more. I'll see if I can make a graph or two from the postmark-test.ods file. (my arts & crafts skills are a bit rusty, so no promises) - -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlM8gc8ACgkQZMpuZ8CyrciWAgCePOf/0hN74giwdRUCpsHbUD5T 3iwAniygx5ouCZbna7VwpZMCaXbcPZKs =3mLX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
