Re: [arch-dev-public] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Am 28.03.2014 17:11, schrieb Martti Kühne:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Bigby James <bigby.james@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So you think it's justifiable to expect someone you don't know to spend more
>> time than necessary performing a tedious and monotonous task, because maybe,
>> someday, it might make your life slightly more convenient? What if that "one
>> day" is a year from now? Two years? And what if your time spent "experimenting"
>> leads you to conclude that these things are "factually useless" to you? What
>> then of the effort the devs put into it?
>>
> 
> 
> How did it happen that we're arguing about someone else's effort? Both
> of us are not trying to tell anyone to do anything, because people
> know that if they do something they do something and if they don't
> they don't. Stop standing in the way.

You can actually stop arguing about the SELinux issue entirely, since I
think I heard all the basic arguments on both sides (if you have
something _really_ new to add though, feel free to do so). I'll make up
my mind about it and decide how we proceed.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux