-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 03/19/2014 10:34 PM, Sean Greenslade wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:42:46PM -0400, Mark Lee wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 03/19/2014 09:40 PM, Sean Greenslade wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:06:18AM +0000, Mauro Santos wrote: >>>> On 20-03-2014 00:41, Sean Greenslade wrote: >>>>> Hi, folks. I've been noodling over this rather odd issue I've been >>>>> having, and I thought I'd get a second opinion on things. >>>>> <SNIP> >>>>> So I'm stumped, here. Anyone have any clue as to what's happening? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> --Sean >>>>> >>>> >>>> Just a guess but you might want to change the unit type to simple >>>> instead of oneshot. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mauro Santos >>> >>> I thought of that, but it just does the same thing. The scrub command >>> returns after forking(?) back the real scrub process. Now, maybe if >>> someone has a clever way of making the service detect when the scrub >>> finishes, I could do a remainafterexit unit, but I can't see a way to do >>> that. >>> >>> --Sean >>> >> Salutations, >> >> If it's supposed to fork, you may want to switch to type=forking. >> >> See <http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.service.html> >> >> Regards, >> Mark > > I did an strace on the start scrub process, but my knowledge on its > output is limited. I _believe_ this line means that it is forking, but > can someone else confirm this? > > clone(child_stack=0, flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD, child_tidptr=0x7ffbb9fddb50) = 713 > > > --Sean > Salutations, Did you try to just switch to type=forking? Regards, Mark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlMqU/oACgkQZ/Z80n6+J/YFkQEAkI598OvFLLDNceXB++k3o1dO hJJymcHIA28aPsAWqScA/0I9xA9s8OvKYr0g/BDGRboJxd0CQPMuSsyOwadyR9vu =ezb8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
