Re: Zramswap for /tmp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Zramswap for /tmp
From: GSC <xgdgsc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:28:02 +0800
In-reply-to: <CA+V+k=Ye0FHNP+pjf_T1L8BkrdKpjyF1budUoqrugCoHn9ENdA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0

On 2014年03月13日 19:26, Mark Lee wrote:

Salutations,

I wanted to float the idea of mounting /tmp on zram. We could still use the
50% ratio (or something less) but reduce the risk of running out of ram
while using tmpfs.

Regards,
Mark

I find zram not very stable. Several system freeze happened to me and Istopped using it,

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Zramswap for /tmp
  - From: Karol Blazewicz
- Re: Zramswap for /tmp
  - From: Simon Perry

References:
- Zramswap for /tmp
  - From: Mark Lee

Prev by Date: Zramswap for /tmp
Next by Date: Re: Zramswap for /tmp
Previous by thread: Zramswap for /tmp
Next by thread: Re: Zramswap for /tmp
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux