N30N wrote: > Hi there, > > Mozilla have made a fork of the libjpeg-turbo package called mozjpeg, > which features improved encoding: > https://blog.mozilla.org/research/2014/03/05/introducing-the-mozjpeg-project/ > > I'd like to propose making the switch. The "library configuration > defaults are the same as for libjpeg-turbo, in order to make transitions > as painless as possible". A PKGBUILD can be found on the AUR: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mozjpeg/ > > > Thanks for your consideration, > N30N. > -1. mozjpeg offers slightly improved compression at the cost of up to x10 increase in compression time (*). It may be something to consider later if they manage to improve the speed although they expect that it will always remain slower than libjpeg-turbo. Jerome (*) https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg/issues/13 -- mailto:jeberger@xxxxxxx http://jeberger.free.fr Jabber: jeberger@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature