Re: bridge with netctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thursday 06 Mar 2014 16:14:19 arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > This configuration make no sense whatsoever.
> > 
> > 1) You create a bridge with no ports. What purpose does it serve?
> > 2) If you want to add enp7s0 as a port, why do you have a configuration
> > for enp7s0? If an interface is a bridge port, it cannot be used for IP
> > traffic, so assigning it an IP is pointless.
> 
> If I understand correctly, in fact I took the set up upside down. I
> tried br0 ---> enp7s0 when in fact the scheme is
> 
>                                       |-----> dev 1
> 
> enp7s0 ----> bridge br0 ----|
> 
>                                       |------> dev 2
> 
> Am I correct in this scheme?

What do you mean by dev 1 and dev 2?

Paul


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux