On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:24:38PM +0100, Simon Thelen wrote: > I don't consider this nonsense, wifi-menu is not an essential part of > netctl so dialog shouldn't be in the depends. wifi-menu also isn't > important enough to receive its own package. I see zero problem with > wifi-menu remaining a binary in netctl that requires an optdepend in > order to function because wifi-menu does nothing extraordinary but > provide a simple user interface to netctl. > > To sum it up: the status-quo is fine as it is. There is no point in > changing something that not only works but also makes perfect sense. Moreover, netctl is in base so it shouldn't bring unessential dependencies.
