On 01/05/2014 08:07 AM, Kalrish Bäakjen wrote: > These were all the ideas. If you haven't understood something, please > ask. Thanks, > Kalrish All are good ideas, but I think they work against simplicity that Arch tries to maintain. In several cases there are multiple library versions available out of necessity. libpng, libpng12, etc... I understand what you are proposing, but I have a feeling it would be manpower prohibitive to do on any larger scale than what is presently done. The question I have is "What is the criteria that would determine which packages need/get multiple versions?" -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
