Am 03.01.2014 15:03, schrieb Øyvind Heggstad: >> You are suggesting not changing to a sane default because some >> packages (especially in the AUR) have crappy maintainers. That's >> hardly a reason for anything. >> >> > > Your defenition of sane default might not match someone elses. > > Many people prefer their box to not slow to a crawl just because they > started makepkg :) Again, we're not changing to a sane default because some people are unable to use their machines properly? 'nice' works just fine, and I haven't seen machines slow down due to compiling even without it - the Linux scheduler handles many simultaneous workloads just fine.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
