On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 19:39:03 +0100 Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Really? Who? Hmm, me. Intel atom here... > You are suggesting not changing to a sane default because some packages > (especially in the AUR) have crappy maintainers. That's hardly a reason > for anything. A sane default would probably be $(nproc)-1. But in general, is it a good idea to have calls to binaries in a config file? So far, makepkg.conf doesn't have anything like this. Happy new year, Leonid. -- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
