On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 14:04 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Ralf Mardorf > <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Since Ubuntu for my taste made a big step in the wrong direction, I'm > > thinking about an Arch audio distro that can be used by inexperienced > > users. > <snip> > > Isn't it to hard for inexperienced users, musicians who aren't > > interested in computer technology, who only want to use a computer, to > > set up Arch Linux? > > They should use Ubuntu Studio or something else. 'Easy-setup' Arch > derivatives do exist, but who will support those users when the > inevitable problems arise? > > If someone isn't interested in computer technology and only wants to > use a computer, then you do him/her a disservice by providing an > easy-to-install Arch. Now, if the parties providing such Arch installs > are also going to be providing support and trouble-shooting services, > then no issue. Archbang, for example, provides their own support. Good point! Thanks for the brain storming, I guess it's not a good idea to build an audio distro. Regards, Ralf
