Re: glibc 2.18-5 question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 2013-09-26 08:53, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> Some Arch packages even provide static libraries for convenience, such
> as gcc and glibc. And unfortunately a few higher-level packages also
> provide static libraries because their maintainers did not notice the
> waste of space...

Well, static libraries are not a waste of space if it was intentional.
Static linking should be preferred for a number of reasons[0], they
should be preferred in any sane Linux distribution (of which,
unfortunately I can't name any at the moment until stali comes out).

0: http://sta.li/faq

Attachment: pgpKQG9cYihsJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux