On 8 August 2013 14:33, Paul Gideon Dann <pdgiddie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Regardless, I originally chose openntpd because it seemed easier to configure, > but I've since realised that's not really true. NTP itself is perfectly > simple, and definitely *is* very well supported. > > Paul That was my reasoning too. I think I'm leaning that way too now though. There are more options, it's more expensive in time to configure, but from taking a proper look I don't think it will be 'harder'. -- :wq!