Re: does using kms mean that you're stick to a framebuffer with specific resolution that you can't change?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: General Discussion about Arch Linux <
arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re: does using kms mean that you're stick to a framebuffer with specific resolution that you can't change?
From
: Jesse Jaara <
jesse.jaara@xxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:30:05 +0300
In-reply-to
: <CAMQ-g0cYTe=tC_rDc6d3vjTT8X3E0Cucau8+3TXb6iC0S7=HPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to
: General Discussion about Arch Linux <
arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
fbset -xres X -yres Y Use that.
References
:
Re: does using kms mean that you're stick to a framebuffer with specific resolution that you can't change?
From:
Jan Alexander Steffens
Prev by Date:
Re: [arch-dev-public] gcc 4.8 breaking libdrm for me
Next by Date:
Re: [arch-dev-public] gcc 4.8 breaking libdrm for me
Previous by thread:
Re: does using kms mean that you're stick to a framebuffer with specific resolution that you can't change?
Next by thread:
Wrapper for yaourt and pacman
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Wireless]
[Linux Kernel]
[ATH6KL]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]