Rodrigo Rivas <rodrigorivascosta@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Dear ArchGeneral List, > > First of all, congratulations for another brave step forward with the /*bin > -> /usr/bin move. All my Arch boxes upgraded with no pain. > > But I've noticed that there has been some discussion about moving > /usr/local/sbin -> /usr/local/bin. > > Beware! There are packages out there that are distributed as tarballs and > install themselves on /usr/local. I don't know how frequent they are, but > I've seen them. And if they happen to contain any file in /usr/local/sbin, > when untarring, it will silently overwrite the symbolic link with the real > directlry breaking any application that depends on it, and making future > upgrades to `filesystem` impossible. > > Yes, it can be fixed simply running tar with the -h (--dereference) flag, > but who will remember that? > > Just my 0.02€. Were them source distributions you can (hopefully) build with some more careful options; it would be generally hopeless if only binary releases were provided. -- Carl Lei (XeCycle) Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University OpenPGP public key: 7795E591 Fingerprint: 1FB6 7F1F D45D F681 C845 27F7 8D71 8EC4 7795 E591
Attachment:
pgpkBc0SJ2f4S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
