On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Karol Babioch <karol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Am 13.05.2013 18:02, schrieb Tom Gundersen: >> I would like to push Bluez 5 to the repos, and rename Bluez 4 to >> 'bluez4'. Some things still require Bluez 4, and the two can not be >> installed together, so this is how I propose to do it. > >> Any objections? > > I'm quite interested in Bluez 5 and would like to have it running as > soon as possible ;). Any updates on the progress of your RFC? So far no comments, so I'll go ahead with my plan as soon as I find time. > Do you > have a list of applications currently not ready to work with Bluez 5 and > still requiring Bluez 4 and its API? I didn't look much into this at all (I'm currently suffering from a bad internet connection, so will get back to this next week), but at least libbluedevil still uses Bluez4. Cheers, Tom
