On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been > updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)? > > Regards As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot of applications.
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been > updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)? > > Regards As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot of applications.