Re: mkinitcpio: fsck - Does it actually make sense?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Karol Babioch <karol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering whether it makes actually sense to include the fsck hook
> into the initial ramdisk. With the "current" switch to systemd
> filesystems get fsck'ed by default anyway, so it seems to be sort of
> redundant.
>
> Is there something I'm missing here, or how do you handle this?
>
> Best regards,
> Karol Babioch

You really want to be able to fsck the root filesystem before you
mount it, as doing it while it's mounted read-only has several
caveats, e.g. it requires an immediate reboot if the fsck changed
anything, to ensure consistency of FS state on disk and in memory.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux