Re: [arch-dev-public] BIND10? No, thanks.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Armin K. <krejzi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why not keep bind9? ... It has not been abandoned upstream and I see no
> conflicts between bind9 and bind10 - think gtk+2 and gtk+3 ... Both can
> exist on the same system, but I doubt that two bind daemons can run at the
> same time.


I want ifconfig back!
I'll most likely be disapproved by the mod again, my point remains,
arch is an early adopter/early deprecator distro. Let's keep it that
way. Let's move forward, change stuff and use lighter solutions which
are obviously out there.

cheers!
mar77i


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux