Also, this move was publicized in the forums, IRC topic, mailing list and front-page news. Seriously, if you're updating a months-old system, you'd better go over the front-page news, at the very least. Gesh On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Rodrigo Rivas <rodrigorivascosta@xxxxxxxxx > wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:32 PM, David C. Rankin < > drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 03/12/2013 04:13 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > > > There needs to be a check in the current update that checks to see whether > > the > > /lib link can safely be removed -- before it is removed by whatever > package > > update does it. Otherwise, anyone who has not updated in several months > > will be > > hit by the same issue. > > > I don't think this link can be removed at all! It is still in `filesystem`, > at least in my filesystem-2013.03-2. And it is needed by practically every > program, as the default dynamic linker is set to `/lib/ld-linux.so.2`, at > least in i686. > > Then, there is the question of how did you happen to lose this link... I > don't have an answer for that. > > Rodrigo >
