Re: [arch-dev-public] BIND10? No, thanks.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] BIND10? No, thanks.
From: Genes Lists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 20:37:54 -0500
In-reply-to: <20130309235018.GB16744@aji.vesath.org>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:22.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/22.0a1

On 03/09/2013 06:50 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:

> 
> It is really beyond me why you would state your uninformed opinion
> having not read anything about the benefits of ldns+unbound+nsd when

  Sorry - i missed the nsd reference in your original mail. Mea culpa.
nsd indeed is interesting and solid.

  Thanks for pointing it out - I am now better informed.

gene/

References:
- Re: [arch-dev-public] BIND10? No, thanks.
  - From: Genes Lists
- Re: [arch-dev-public] BIND10? No, thanks.
  - From: Gaetan Bisson

Prev by Date: Re: [arch-dev-public] BIND10? No, thanks.
Next by Date: Re: RFID - 1. reader driver, 2. alien package for an app
Previous by thread: Re: [arch-dev-public] BIND10? No, thanks.
Next by thread: Re: [arch-dev-public] BIND10? No, thanks.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux