On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Ionut Biru <ibiru@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > pacman -Qo /usr/lib/xorg/modules/dri/swrast_dri.so > pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 > > Thank you Ionut. The conflicting files are owned by libgl 9.0.2-1 - but I am unsure whether this means that libgl needs to be removed before running the updates? Will mesa-libgl then replace the functionality that libgl currently provides? I'd like to be sure before doing this so I don't do something that could cause my system graphics to fail. I did not see any announcement saying this was going to happen? Thanks -- mike c
