[Replying to arch-general since I'm not allowed to post to arch-dev-public] On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Alexander Rødseth <rodseth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It's not a given that a vi clone is the most desirable replacement. If an > editor that is not a vi clone should be preferred, now or in the future, a > symlink named vi looks funny. How about splitting out a vim-vi-compat (or whatever you want to name it) package that just contains the /usr/bin/vim -> /usr/bin/vi symlink. This could then provide 'vi' and conflict with it. This way people can replace /usr/bin/vi with whatever vi package they want easily, while being able to keep vim, if they want. Best, Mika
