On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0100, Joakim Hernberg wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:33:23 +0300 > MSal <msal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > 70-uaccess.rules is not a backup file and AFAIK any modifications will > > be overwritten in the next update. > > I have no /etc/udev/rules.d/70-uaccess.rules on my system, i do have > a /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/70-uaccess.rules though. I think creating > the /etc/udev/rules.d/70-uaccess.rules to /dev/null symlink will > override the standard rule and will not be overwritten by upgrading the > udev package. > If /etc/udev/rules.d/70-uaccess.rules would be applied on top of /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/70-uaccess.rules , that would have been great. As one can try to revese the undesired rule and still incorporate all upgrades. But cancelling all the rules is a no go for me as I don't want to be running an almost unique setup just because udev/systemd/loginctl didn't think of group permissions. If systemd developers thought of supporting ACLs based on GIDs at least, this would have been a no issue.
