Re: Invalid signatures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:11:38PM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:02:23 -0500
> Dave Reisner <d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:50:01PM -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> > > Saw these errors from pacman today, which are preventing me from
> > > upgrading some packages:
> > > 
> > > error: directfb: signature from "Eric Belanger <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
> > > is invalid
> > > error: xmms2: signature from "Sergej Pupykin <arch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>" is
> > > invalid error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package
> > > (PGP signature))
> > > 
> > > Anyone have an idea what's up?
> > > 
> > > DR
> > 
> > Nuke the packages from your cache, and redownload them. The error
> > message is misleading -- the signatures are invalid FOR the packages,
> > meaning the package data is not what the signature "expected".
> > 
> > The situation is much improved come pacman 4.1 -- we'll just prompt you
> > to delete the package, much like we did historically when a package
> > failed checksums.
> > 
> > d
> 
> A bit OT, but anyway... Are there any plans for actually storing *.sig files
> in the cache alongside the packages? This costs a tiny amount of space, but
> IMHO will make verification (especially of old packages) much easier.

We don't have any plans right now to do this.

d


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux