Porque systemd? :-)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent "systemd is now the default on new
installations" announcement, I'm wondering: what's the reasons for Arch
making systemd the default going forward? The systemd wiki page gives a
lot of technical information, but doesn't really clarify any of the
motivations behind the move.
Note: this msg is not any criticism of the Arch devs (I haven't yet
formed *any* opinion on systemd), or intended to start a flamewar about
the pros and cons of the switch. So just a simple RTFM response like
"see this mailing list thread for background" would be perfect.
Thanks,
DR
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Wireless]
[Linux Kernel]
[ATH6KL]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]