On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Gaetan Bisson <bisson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [2012-10-14 10:19:10 +0200] Menachem Moystoviz: >> So in essence, what you're proposing is to only upgrade from VPS to private >> hosting when the resiliency of my private server is good enough - i.e. not most >> naive setups? It does make sense, and would make backups more urgent >> and important. > > Backups are a must regardless of your setup. Next comes the question of > reliability: how much downtime are you willing to trade for convenience? > > Here is what I do: I nearly exclusively use my official email addresses > (professional, university alumni, Arch Linux) because there are people > who will notice and fix any issue 24/7, and I care deeply that every > email sent to me reaches its destination; whenever I feel like reading > emails, I pull them from those accounts onto my machine (and send a copy > to gmail automatically - I only use them as a backup service); I read my > emails comfortably using mutt and have a unison regularly synchronize > the (encrypted) copy of my emails I have on all my machines. > > I also run postfix on my home server but only use it to run a couple of > silly mailing lists that I am perfectly willing to lose for a few weeks > if it so happens that I am travelling and my server breaks down. I would > not trust a private VPS more, nor any server that has a single admin. > > Cheers. > > -- > Gaetan So basically, your setup is something like: Use corporate mail, pulling email onto your machine each time you read it, plus some backups and your own mail server for hobbyist stuff? Sounds quite similar to what I had in mind. Thanks. Gesh
