On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 07:59:52AM +0200, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:15:39 -0400 > schrieb Dave Reisner <d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > I apologize for this being somewhat after-the-fact. It was discussed > > on IRC, but that of course doesn't necessarily cater to a wide enough > > audience. Some of you have probably already noticed that systemd 189 > > now provides, conflicts, and replaces libsystemd and systemd-tools. > > This is the next logical step since systemd will eventually be in > > base once we have sufficient unit coverage. > > > > As an added bonus, maybe this will encourage people who haven't > > switched over yet to do so. ;) > > "Nobody is forcing systemd on anybody." > > Wasn't it this what was always said by the devs in all those long > threads about systemd? And what are you doing now? Isn't this not > forcing it on everybody? > > "Nobody has the intention to build a wall." > > Heiko I am pretty sure it said they will still work together, you still aren't forced to use it, you don't need udev etc... -- Daniel Wallace Archlinux Trusted User (gtmanfred) Georgia Institute of Technology
Attachment:
pgp62Ky8a0Qed.pgp
Description: PGP signature
