On 22 August 2012 01:40, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Patrick Murphy <thegerdur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> What alternative to systemd would you rather see? > > systemd is the alternative, the standard has been initscripts for > decades. Now that distributions are switching to systemd they are > starting to see boot problems that didn't exist before. > > -- > Felipe Contreras And sysvinit didn't have those when it began? Come on. Also, nobody is forcing you gun in hand, your life depending on it, to use systemd. Arch is going to use it by DEFAULT, if you don't like it, just install another init system and let everyone else do whatever they feel like doing.
