On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 03:11:16PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > Not because > > it is good software but because the other adequate software that this > > community depends on is going to require it. > > Let me know so I'm aware what the software you have in mind is if it > hasn't been mentioned please. > > Debian and Ubuntu plus the BSDs make up far more of the user base than > the rest put together and has Redhat switched yet?, so when I think > about it, I find this unlikely. Programs may need compiling to work > with or without systemd which will be annoying as I don't agree with > wasting resources building everything in the Gentoo style, though it > would be handy. > > -- > _______________________________________________________________________ > > 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work > together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a > universal interface' > > (Doug McIlroy) > ______________________________________________________________________ If I recall correctly I don't believe you would have to modify any program to work with systemd, the only thing you'd have to do is create a unit for it. (Though I could be wrong please correct me if I'm wrong.)_
