On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Gaetan Bisson <bisson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [2012-08-15 12:27:33 +0200] Felipe Contreras: >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > 4./ be as fast as possible >> > >> > systemd meets 4. >> >> I agree in general, but systemd doesn't meet #4; we are supposed to >> believe that's the case, but does it really? > > Are you trying to play smart by ass throwing random rhetorical questions > around, or just plain stupid not having the slightest beginning of sound > technical evidence to back up your claims? How is that rhetorical? If you are making the claim that systemd is faster, you should have clear undeniable evidence at hand, where is it? If you are not making that claim, then you agree with me that #4 is not proven. I'm afraid you will be asking me for evidence (even though I'm not making a claim, so I shouldn't need it; it's the one making the claim that has the burden of proof), but here evidence for the contrary in my case (systemd is slower): http://people.freedesktop.org/~felipec/systemd/bootchart_sysd.png http://people.freedesktop.org/~felipec/systemd/bootchart_sysv.png Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras
