On Aug 14, 2012 6:52 PM, "Leon Feng" <rainofchaos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 2012/8/15 Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Am 14.08.2012 18:19, schrieb Brandon Watkins: > >> Systemd isn't going anywhere anytime soon, its going to be adopted by RHEL > >> (which means it would also be adopted by RHEL derivatives like CentOS), and > >> its being adopted by major distros like fedora, opensuse, mageia etc... > > > > What are those "major distributions"? > > > > 1) Debian, Ubuntu, Mint and derivatives > > 2) Fedora and derivatives > > 3) openSuSE > > 4) Arch > > 5) Mandriva / Mageia > > 6) Slackware > > 7) Gentoo > > > > That's about it. As you see, I included Arch up there. As far as I can > > see, after Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, Fedora and openSuSE (in no particular > > order), Arch has been number 6 on the list of "major Linux > > distributions" (excluding professional stuff like SLES or RHEL) for > > several years. > > > > What I am trying to say is: It no longer suffices to say "we follow the > > major distributions" when making a decision, as Arch itself is a major > > distribution now. > > > > Still, your point stands: Redhat will be funding systemd development for > > quite a while. > > > > > > As a rolling release, Arch is usually the leader of adopt new technology. > But now, Arch is falling behind Debian now. So sad. > > Chao I admit I miss some news but last i read debian was NOT moving to systemd because it only supports Linux... So how are we falling behind them?
