On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 15:23 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 09:13 -0400, Baho Utot wrote: > > On 08/14/2012 08:59 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 13:45 +0100, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > > >> and easier for most users to maintain > > > USERS? I'm a stupid user. I guess you're talking about experts. For > > > "USERS" it's hard to follow changes every half year. We stupid users > > > simply want to use the computer. We are willing to learn, but we won't > > > start from the beginning, every half year. > > > > > > Btw. I'm a computer dino, so for me nothing is bad with the obsolete > > > PASCAL style of the configs. Oh wait, I always hated to program Pascal. > > > > > > "CheersRalf" > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aye yes pascal, learned a lot from that language I did. > > > > > > WritingPascalSavesAlotOf"Space"ButTheCodeTendsToBecomeUnreadable. > OkPascalCaseIsnTtheOnlyIssueWithPascalItEgAlsoTeachedUsToDoTheWorkTheCompilerShouldDoRegardingToEgVariables. > ImightBeMistakenSinceIonlyTestedPascalWithTheC64AndDecidedToUseAssemblerInstead. > RegardsRalf PS: To be fair, IIRC for the C64's Pascal everything was uppercase, hence it was much more fun.
