On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 19:11 +0530, gt wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:50:16PM +0530, Jayesh Badwaik wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Another flame may start here, but I would like to present the following > > as a pure news, no opinions[1]. > > > > Of course, after reading all the discussions on the mailing lists, my > > feeling after reading the link? Mwuhahahaha. > > > > Important quotes from the link ( which I hope do not alter the context > > of the post): > > > > "Well, we intent to continue to make it possible to run udevd outside of > > systemd. But that's about it. We will not polish that, or add new > > features to that or anything. > > > > OTOH we do polish behaviour of udev when used *within* systemd however, > > and that's our primary focus. > > > > And what we will certainly not do is compromise the uniform integration > > into systemd for some cosmetic improvements for non-systemd systems. > > > > (Yes, udev on non-systemd systems is in our eyes a dead end, in case you > > haven't noticed it yet. I am looking forward to the day when we can drop > > that support entirely.)" > > > > [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012- > > August/006066.html > > Lennart Poettering wants to control GNU/Linux, period. And, he has been > quite effective in furthering his goals through his "great" ideas. > > I see that linus torvalds will have competition pretty soon on who gets > to be the overlord. Or maybe they can coexist, one in kernel land and > the other in userspace land ;) Some time ago I called "Linux" "Lennux".
