On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Baho Utot <baho-utot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/10/2012 08:11 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> >> OT: Btw. it would be nice if everybody has got the choice to use or not >> to use systemd. IMO there's no need to talk about pros and cons, >> Poettering again and again. I suspect we use different mail clients, >> daemons etc. too. >> > > Sadly, I don't think in the long run that will be possible, given that > systemd has taken over udev and udev is now a part of systemd. > > In April 2012, udev's source tree was merged into systemd. That's not a problem. We currently use udev from the sysntemd-tools package with initsrcipts (as well as many other tools that systemd provides), and I do not expect this to cause problems anytime soon. The only issue I see with supporting more than one init system is that it means more work for the packagers. -t
