On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Leonid Isaev <lisaev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:31:06 -0400 > Jack Silver <jacksilver045@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> To exchange information I want to let know this list that I have filled a >> feature request form to ask for a statically builded pacman. >> >> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30993 >> >> Comments welcome in the bug manager. >> >> جاك الفضة > > Well, bugtracker is not a place for comments, it's for solutions. > > Anyway... statically compiling things is not a way of avoiding trouble, at > least not in a self-sustained fashion. So, if you propose to have pacman in > [core] statically compiled against all needed libraries, I would be against > that as the package will be an unmaintainable mess. Why would it be a unmaintainable mess?
