On 03/08/12 00:55, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote: > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos >> <artafinde@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Are there any plans for eventually adopting Wayland over X? >> >> I'm not aware of any discussions. >> >> If I understand correctly, we won't have to make a decision either >> way, we can just add support for Wayland to the various parts of the >> stack as it becomes available, and people can chose for themselves. >> That said, most toolkits and window managers are not yet ready for >> Wayland, so at the moment it is not much point in doing this (unless >> you are helping with testing/development). >> >> -t > > Hey Tom- > > I would be happy to do testing for wayland, and development (although > I am lacking time..). Is there some other devs interested in it? I > think we need to start with some tracking down toolkits and WM that > require some work. > > Cheers > L. > > Sure you can do testing for Wayland, there is even an AUR package for it [1]. There is also a wiki page, which you edit and add documentation [2]. 1. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30350 2. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Wayland -- Jelle van der Waa
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
