On Thursday, July 26, 2012 12:07:02 PM Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 11:57 +0200, Dennis Herbrich wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:52:49AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 12:43 +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Jayesh Badwaik > > > > > > > > <jayesh.badwaik90@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > With respect to daemons, the BEFORE and AFTER in the service files > > > > > is > > > > > redundant and though not likely to cause errors, likely to be > > > > > inconsistent, because for every service file where a daemon "xyz" > > > > > appears > > > > > in AFTER, the corresponding daemon must appear in BEFORE in the > > > > > service > > > > > file for xyz. I am not quiet sure why this redundancy is there, you > > > > > can > > > > > simply have just "AFTER" variables and they should take care of all > > > > > the > > > > > dependencies I guess. > > > > > > > > This is certainly not true – it is enough for /one/ unit to have > > > > Before or After. > > > > > > Sorry, what kind of new logic philosophy/math do users need to learn? > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic Pardon, I only know the German Wiki, > > > since my English is broken. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundancy > > > > By the way, I, for one, am increasingly annoyed by (not only) your style > > of > > discussion. Not that it'd matter in any way, but I miss the times of > > productive and helpful threads on this list. > > > > HTH, > > > > Dennis > > I don't claim to be an expert, I already mentioned that I'm a dummy. So > again: Is Linux in the future for experts only? So much for world domination!
