Am Wed, 25 Jul 2012 07:51:15 +0200 (CEST) schrieb okraits@xxxxxxxx: > this is simply not true. Sorry, but this is simply true. I know Windoze XP and I had to use it long enough, far too long. > First of all, starting with Windows XP the stability of Windows (yes, > Windows, not Windoze) got much better and there are very few crashes > which are mostly related to driver issues, IMO. Much better? Slightly better! And, yes, Windoze. > Secondly, Windows doesn't need to be reinstalled every 3 months. Come > on, most companies use Windows on their desktops and they don't need > to reinstall them every 3 months. And their employees actually can > work with their computers. I used Windoze long enough. And I had to reinstall it every 3 months, and I know a lot of people who also had to do it this often. Since Windoze XP it was maybe not every 3 months anymore, but still often enough. > And i don't say this because i like Windows but because i'm realistic > and not unfair. I don't live in a world where one system is perfect > and the others are all completely crap. If you think that Windows is > completely bad then you're not professional. I am realistic and professional, because I speak from experience, like I said before more than 25 years. Windoze is completely bad. Otherwise I wouldn't get fits of raving madness every time I have to work with this crap, which is fortunately not too often anymore. > BTW: pacman.conf is written in an ini-style as well. Not really. Heiko
