On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Christoph Vigano <mail@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 7/24/2012 4:51 PM, schrieb Mantas Mikulėnas: > >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Heiko Baums <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, I don't like those Windoze like ini files of systemd, too. >> >> >> I honestly don't know if this is serious. What is the difference >> between a "key=value" rc.conf and a "key=value" ini file of systemd? >> > > I think he refers to those sections: [Unit], [Service], [Install] and > whatnot, I have not explored all of those yet. > > But, those are not Windows-like INI-Files. Those files are meant to be > following some XDG Desktop File Descripton Standard Whose Name I Not Now > (tm), making them easy parseable by existing libraries and programs that > implement this standard. > > They are not enforced to be following this standard (show itself if you have > a type=forking .service and define multiple ExecStartPost sections for > instance), but are encouraged to be. > > It's all in the documentation ;) > > But yes, in the end all of those are key=value pairs. Just like our holy pacman.conf... -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? For more information, please read: http://idallen.com/topposting.html ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 -------------------------------------------
