Am Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:07:50 +0200 schrieb Heiko Baums <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Btw., in all those discussions about systemd as well as in all those > discussions about PulseAudio, I always read more or less > technical arguments from people who have objections against them or > have tried them and have seen that they don't really work. From the > people who like systemd and/or PulseAudio I only read arguments like > "it's faster", "it's an evolution", "it's new", "everybody > (distribution) uses it", "it has this and that feature", which > actually only makes sense and works in a very few cases or can easily > be achieved in other ways. But I haven't, yet, read any technical > argument for them, why it is technically better, why it doesn't break > the UNIX philosophy, why it is reliable enough etc. Well, now I must correct myself. I just read Tom's explanation about some technical details of systemd. The first one so far, which clarifies it a bit. Heiko
