Hi, Thanks for the clarification. Also I was wondering if there was any reason why Arch doesn't have the rc-local.service in systemd by default. There was some stuff I ran in rc.local (reducing brightness, proxy authentication) but it seems there is no rc-local service in systemd. I am working on copying content from fedoras rc-local.service and trying to get it to work on my laptop. -aurko On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Aurko Roy <roy.aurko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> You're right, on digging deeper (logs) I found that the fsck had >> failed earlier as well but I never noticed it as the boot process >> wasn't interrupted. I didn't face it again after setting passno. to 0. >> I had heard about btrfs being released without a proper fsck in place >> but I thought that was long ago and that btrfsck was ready for general >> use. > > I have been using btrfs as my rootfs on all my machines for a couple > of years and never seen a corruption that required fsck, so I don't > know how well (or not) btrfsck actually works. I would assume it would > not be too bad, as it is shipped by at least Oracle. The problem > though is that it does not implement the correct API for integration > with regular fsck, so it can only be called manually and not > automatically on boot. > > -t
